[PATCH 5/9] ARM: common: Introduce PM domains for CPUs/clusters
Rob Herring
robherring2 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 5 20:14:51 PDT 2015
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer at linaro.org> wrote:
> Define and add Generic PM domains (genpd) for ARM CPU clusters. Many new
> SoCs group CPUs as clusters. Clusters share common resources like GIC,
> power rail, caches, VFP, Coresight etc. When all CPUs in the cluster are
> idle, these shared resources may also be put in their idle state.
>
> The idle time between the last CPU entering idle and a CPU resuming
> execution is an opportunity for these shared resources to be powered
> down. Generic PM domain provides a framework for defining such power
> domains and attach devices to the domain. When the devices in the domain
> are idle at runtime, the domain would also be suspended and resumed
> before the first of the devices resume execution.
>
> We define a generic PM domain for each cluster and attach CPU devices in
> the cluster to that PM domain. The DT definitions for the SoC describe
> this relationship. Genpd callbacks for power_on and power_off can then
> be used to power up/down the shared resources for the domain.
[...]
> +ARM CPU Power domains
> +
> +The device tree allows describing of CPU power domains in a SoC. In ARM SoC,
> +CPUs may be grouped as clusters. A cluster may have CPUs, GIC, Coresight,
> +caches, VFP and power controller and other peripheral hardware. Generally,
> +when the CPUs in the cluster are idle/suspended, the shared resources may also
> +be suspended and resumed before any of the CPUs resume execution.
> +
> +CPUs are the defined as the PM domain consumers and there is a PM domain
> +provider for the CPUs. Bindings for generic PM domains (genpd) is described in
> +[1].
> +
> +The ARM CPU PM domain follows the same binding convention as any generic PM
> +domain. Additional binding properties are -
> +
> +- compatible:
> + Usage: required
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: Must also have
> + "arm,pd"
> + inorder to initialize the genpd provider as ARM CPU PM domain.
A compatible string should represent a particular h/w block. If it is
generic, it should represent some sort of standard programming
interface (e.g, AHCI, EHCI, etc.). This doesn't seem to be either and
is rather just a mapping of what "driver" you want to use.
I would expect that identifying a cpu's or cluster's power domain
would be done by a phandle between the cpu/cluster node and power
domain node. But I've not really looked at the power domain bindings
so who knows.
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list