[PATCH] kvm:arm:Fix error handling in the function vgic_v3_probe
nick
xerofoify at gmail.com
Wed Aug 5 10:07:18 PDT 2015
On 2015-08-05 12:59 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/08/2015 18:48, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This fixes the error handling in the function vgic_v3_probe
>> for when calling the function kvm_register_device_ops to check
>> if the call to this function has returned a error code and if
>> so jump to the label out with goto to cleanup no longer required
>> resources used by the function vgic_v3_probe before returning the
>> error code from the call to kvm_register_device_ops to the caller
>> of the function vgic_v3_probe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c | 10 +++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> index dff0602..5102aa2 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> @@ -264,12 +264,16 @@ int vgic_v3_probe(struct device_node *vgic_node,
>> } else {
>> vgic->vcpu_base = vcpu_res.start;
>> vgic->can_emulate_gicv2 = true;
>> - kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops,
>> - KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> + ret = kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops,
>> + KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> }
>> if (vgic->vcpu_base == 0)
>> kvm_info("disabling GICv2 emulation\n");
>> - kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v3_ops, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3);
>> + ret = kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v3_ops, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>>
>> vgic->vctrl_base = NULL;
>> vgic->type = VGIC_V3;
>>
>
> This really should never happen. Perhaps kvm_register_device_ops should
> instead return void, and WARN() when it currently returns an error.
>
> Paolo
>
Paolo,
I would like to do what you want but after tracing the callers of this function I found
this structure and wasn't sure if it can handle void function pointers.
static const struct of_device_id vgic_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic", .data = vgic_v2_probe, },
{ .compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic", .data = vgic_v2_probe, },
{ .compatible = "arm,gic-400", .data = vgic_v2_probe, },
{ .compatible = "arm,gic-v3", .data = vgic_v3_probe, },
{},
};
If this structure of function pointers can handle function pointers with a return type of
void I will be glad to do what you request otherwise this would require a major rewrite
of kvm arm subsystem for a very simple bug fix.
Cheers,
Nick
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list