[PATCH v3 5/5] cpufreq: remove no longer needed CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW config option
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at rjwysocki.net
Mon Aug 3 18:09:11 PDT 2015
On Saturday, August 01, 2015 04:45:37 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31-07-15, 20:49, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Remove no longer needed CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW config option.
> >
> > As a result scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attribute is available
> > when cpufreq-dt driver is used and boost support is enabled.
> >
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab at samsung.com>
> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 4 ----
> > drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 2 --
> > 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > index bf6d596..de00a52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > @@ -21,10 +21,6 @@ if CPU_FREQ
> > config CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON
> > bool
> >
> > -config CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
> > - bool
> > - depends on THERMAL
> > -
> > config CPU_FREQ_STAT
> > tristate "CPU frequency translation statistics"
> > default y
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> > index a8f1daf..4c5de5b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> > @@ -293,9 +293,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs);
> >
> > struct freq_attr *cpufreq_generic_attr[] = {
> > &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
> > &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs,
> > -#endif
> > NULL,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_attr);
>
> So, this will start appearing for all platforms that use cpufreq_generic_attr
> and that may not be the right thing. We may only want to show boost frequencies
> only if the driver supports it.
>
> @Rafael: What do you say?
I agree.
Thanks,
Rafael
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list