[PATCH RFC v1 3/5] clk: remove unneeded __clk_enable and __clk_disable
Stephen Boyd
sboyd at codeaurora.org
Thu Apr 30 15:05:48 PDT 2015
On 04/30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/15/15 07:26, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > The only thing __clk_enable/__clk_disable does is NULL pointer checking
> > of clk except calling clk_core_{enable|disable} which is already handled
> > by clk_core_{enable|disable}.
> > So remove this unneeded function.
> >
> > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong at freescale.com>
> > ---
>
> No. You can call clk_enable() and clk_disable() with NULL and it should
> be a no-op. With this change it would cause a NULL pointer exception.
>
Here's the proper patch. I'll leave you as author.
---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 0227ac3d5b1a..e45255226ffa 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1023,14 +1023,6 @@ static void clk_core_disable(struct clk_core *core)
clk_core_disable(core->parent);
}
-static void __clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
-{
- if (!clk)
- return;
-
- clk_core_disable(clk->core);
-}
-
/**
* clk_disable - gate a clock
* @clk: the clk being gated
@@ -1051,7 +1043,7 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
return;
flags = clk_enable_lock();
- __clk_disable(clk);
+ clk_core_disable(clk->core);
clk_enable_unlock(flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_disable);
@@ -1089,14 +1081,6 @@ static int clk_core_enable(struct clk_core *core)
return 0;
}
-static int __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
-{
- if (!clk)
- return 0;
-
- return clk_core_enable(clk->core);
-}
-
/**
* clk_enable - ungate a clock
* @clk: the clk being ungated
@@ -1115,8 +1099,11 @@ int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
+ if (!clk)
+ return 0;
+
flags = clk_enable_lock();
- ret = __clk_enable(clk);
+ ret = clk_core_enable(clk->core);
clk_enable_unlock(flags);
return ret;
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list