[PATCH v4 09/11] ARM: imx: add imx7d clk tree support
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Tue Apr 21 07:27:47 PDT 2015
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:15:36AM -0500, Zhi Li wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:05:31AM +0800, Frank.Li at freescale.com wrote:
> >> From: Frank Li <Frank.Li at freescale.com>
> >>
> >> Add i.MX7D clk tree support.
> >>
> >> +
> >> + clk_register_clkdev(clks[IMX7D_GPT1_ROOT_CLK], "ipg", "imx-gpt.0");
> >> + clk_register_clkdev(clks[IMX7D_GPT_3M_CLK], "gpt_3m", "imx-gpt.0");
>
> This patch just list all clock root in RM.
Maybe, still the two lines above are unused. The timer code only does a
of_clk_get_by_name which will never return the clocks you register
above.
> all clock refine have to wait for Dong Aisheng's RFC clock framework
> change's patch.
>
> >
> > What are these good for? These shouldn't be here.
> >
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < IMX7D_END_CLK; i++)
> >> + clk_prepare_enable(clks[i]);
> >
> > Hey, no. You enable *all* clocks here which is certainly wrong. They
> > will never be turned off.
>
> Yes. This patches's purpose is bring up mx7.
> Because imx7 clock design change, Dong Aisheng send out RFC patch to
> change a little bit framework.
> After that, we can enable only necessary clock here. Otherwise system
> will halt and block the other part
> upstream.
If that's the case you should state that in the commit message, add a
comment to the code that it needs fixing once Dongs patch is in and
provide a reference to the patch you need.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list