[PATCH 7/7] ARM: BCM63xx: Add SMP support for BCM63138
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Fri Apr 17 16:22:01 PDT 2015
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:33:52PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> +
> +extern unsigned int VFP_arch;
...
> + /* The BCM63138 SoC has two Cortex-A9 CPUs, CPU0 features a complete
> + * and fully functional VFP unit that can be used, but CPU1 does not.
> + * Since we will not be able to trap kernel-mode NEON to force
> + * migration to CPU0, just do not advertise VFP support at all.
> + *
> + * This will make vfp_init bail out and do not attempt to use VFP at
> + * all, for kernel-mode NEON, we do not want to introduce any
> + * conditionals in hot-paths, so we just restrict the system to UP.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VFP
> + if (ncores > 1) {
> + pr_warn("SMP: secondary CPUs lack VFP unit, disabling VFP\n");
> + VFP_arch = 1;
What makes you think that doing this hack would be somehow acceptable?
Please, do the job properly. Add a function hook into the VFP code
called "vfp_disable()" so that it's obvious that you want to disable
it - and, because that code will be localised to VFP, it then becomes
acceptable to set VFP_arch=1. Don't rely on current VFP behaviour
through setting VFP_arch directly in from platform code - that's
nothing more than a hack and a disgusting layering violation.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list