[PATCH 10/13] coresight: etb: retrieve and handle atclk

Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Fri Apr 17 02:21:22 PDT 2015


On 17 April 2015 at 10:58, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> wrote:
> As can be seen from the datasheet of the CoreSight
> Components, DDI0314 table A-8 the ETB has a clock signal
> apart from the AHB interconnect ("amba_pclk", that we're
> already handling) called ATCLK, ARM Trace Clock, that SoC
> implementers may provide from an entirely different clock
> source. So to model this correctly create an optional
> path for handling ATCLK alongside the PCLK so we don't
> break old platforms that only define PCLK ("amba_pclk") but
> still makes it possible for SoCs that have both clock signals
> (such as the DB8500) to fetch and prepare/enable/disable/
> unprepare both clocks.
>
> The ATCLK is enabled and disabled using the runtime PM
> callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/coresight/coresight-etb10.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/coresight/coresight-etb10.c b/drivers/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
> index c4587510a826..7d751a39d959 100644
> --- a/drivers/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
> +++ b/drivers/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/coresight.h>
>  #include <linux/amba/bus.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>
>  #include "coresight-priv.h"
>
> @@ -66,6 +67,7 @@
>   * struct etb_drvdata - specifics associated to an ETB component
>   * @base:      memory mapped base address for this component.
>   * @dev:       the device entity associated to this component.
> + * @atclk:     optional clock for the core parts of the ETB.
>   * @csdev:     component vitals needed by the framework.
>   * @miscdev:   specifics to handle "/dev/xyz.etb" entry.
>   * @spinlock:  only one at a time pls.
> @@ -78,6 +80,7 @@
>  struct etb_drvdata {
>         void __iomem            *base;
>         struct device           *dev;
> +       struct clk              *atclk;
>         struct coresight_device *csdev;
>         struct miscdevice       miscdev;
>         spinlock_t              spinlock;
> @@ -426,6 +429,12 @@ static int etb_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
>         drvdata->dev = &adev->dev;
> +       drvdata->atclk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, "atclk"); /* optional */
> +       if (!IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk)) {
> +               ret = clk_prepare_enable(drvdata->atclk);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
>         dev_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
>
>         /* validity for the resource is already checked by the AMBA core */
> @@ -486,6 +495,34 @@ static int etb_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int etb_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct amba_device *adev = to_amba_device(dev);
> +       struct etb_drvdata *drvdata = amba_get_drvdata(adev);
> +
> +       if (drvdata && !IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk))
> +               clk_disable_unprepare(drvdata->atclk);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int etb_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct amba_device *adev = to_amba_device(dev);
> +       struct etb_drvdata *drvdata = amba_get_drvdata(adev);
> +
> +       if (drvdata && !IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk))
> +               clk_prepare_enable(drvdata->atclk);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops etb_dev_pm_ops = {
> +       SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(etb_runtime_suspend, etb_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
> +
>  static struct amba_id etb_ids[] = {
>         {
>                 .id     = 0x0003b907,
> @@ -498,6 +535,8 @@ static struct amba_driver etb_driver = {
>         .drv = {
>                 .name   = "coresight-etb10",
>                 .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
> +               .pm     = &etb_dev_pm_ops,
> +
>         },
>         .probe          = etb_probe,
>         .remove         = etb_remove,
> --
> 1.9.3
>

With the same comment as I had to previous patchnumber.

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list