Two new breakages since Thursday

[Tony Lindgren]

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> [150414 02:37]:
> On Tuesday 14 April 2015 10:26:12 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:41:34AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 13 April 2015, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 10:00 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > > And almost a week later, and most of these are still present.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Given that the merge window is potentially opening on Sunday, this
> > > > > is very poor, because it means that we've had a week of failing
> > > > > builds in the week before the merge window - the week where we
> > > > > should be stabilising the code and getting it ready for submission
> > > > > to Linus.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Right now, arm-soc is NOT ready for submission to Linus.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please fix this as a top priority.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 09:06:45AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > > > Two new breakages have appeared since Thursday.  The first affects both
> > > > > > ARM and ARM64 builds (a missing file), the second only ARM builds.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-pinfunc.h:18:40: fatal error: dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h: No such file or directory
> > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135-pinfunc.h:18:40: fatal error: dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h: No such file or directory
> > > > > > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S:143: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `dsb'
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Arnd/Olof,
> > > > 
> > > > The mediatek part is due to merge dependency in pinctrl driver. It is
> > > > discussed in
> > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-April/336258.html
> > > > 
> > > > I thought we already decided to revert DT node in arm-soc tree for 4.1.
> > > > What should we do next?
> > > 
> > > I've finally managed to find my way through the email backlog from being
> > > away for three weeks and got to this one now. Patch is reverted in next/dt now.
> > > 
> > > Sorry about the delay in processing this.
> > 
> > Well, if this is now gone, there's still the issue of the AT91 breakage
> > that also needs to be fixed which is still there when I pulled arm-soc
> > last night.  What's happening there?
> > 
> 
> I managed to catch up with my email last night and pulled in these two fixes
> as well as a number of others that we had neglected over the last two weeks.
> 
> I found one new regression with the overnight build tests in a branch I pulled
> in as 'next/late' from Tony, and backed that out now. I'll wait for you and
> Stephen Rothwell (who also reported these issues) to confirm that it's ok
> now and we'll hopefully be ready to send pull requests by the end of the
> week.

Hmm what's this issue you're mentioning here for the next/late? Is it the
merge conflict with camera related changes fixed up by Stephen Rothwell
in next?

Regards,

Tony