[GIT PULL 2/5] Samsung defconfig udpates for v4.1

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Kukjin,

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene at kernel.org> wrote:
> Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> Hello Kukjin,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene at kernel.org> wrote:
>> > The following changes since commit c517d838eb7d07bbe9507871fab3931deccff539:
>> >
>> >   Linux 4.0-rc1 (2015-02-22 18:21:14 -0800)
>> >
>> > are available in the git repository at:
>> >
>> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>> > tags/samsung-defconfig
>> >
>> > for you to fetch changes up to bb84296ae52da844c9cab81e0197152a69f2f841:
>> >
>> >   ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable HDMI support (2015-03-27 02:00:09 +0900)
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Samsung defconfig updates for v4.1
>> >
>> > - update exynos-defconfig
>> >   : enable HDMI, CPUidle, ChromeOS EC chardev driver
>> >     and thermal emulation, Marvell WiFi-Ex, CPUfreq,
>> >     and support for NFS rootfs
>> >   : remove EXYNOS_THERMAL_CORE define
>> >     and disable IOMMU support until support it
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Javier Martinez Canillas (5):
>> >       ARM: exynos_defconfig: Disable IOMMU support
>>
>> As I mentioned before, this also is needed for 4.0-rc to have display
>> working on at least Exynos5420 Peach Pit and Exynos5800 Peach Pi
>> Chromebooks but I saw that it is not included in your "Samsung 2nd
>> fixes for v4.0" git pull [0].
>>
> Yeah, you're right. The 'disabling IOMMU' should be queued for 4.0-rc but I've
> missed. Sorry about that. As you know, the branch has been queued for 4.1
> already so if we send it even the one patch for 4.0-rc, it will cause conflict.
>
> So I think would be better if we could send it to stable after 4.1-rc1? If you
> agree, I'll.
>

Agreed.

>> Maybe it can be sent directly to arm at kernel.org?
>>
> I don't think so because of above reason...
>

Got it,  thanks for the explanation.

> - Kukjin
>

Best regards,
Javier