[PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes

[Wolfram Sang]

> While thinking about it (and I still think of it as a 'big issue'
> compared to the intention of the initial patch) I came to the
> conclusion that I should maybe just go for a board-specific
> i2c-mux-pinctrl node instead of adding it to the SoC dtsi. That will
> also avoid doubled i2c busses on boards with just the default i2c
> option.

Ehrm, then please let me know what you decided on. If you chose the
above road, then I don't need to think about the other questions :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150403/6c78355c/attachment.sig>