Reading twd_base at run-time
Mason
slash.tmp at free.fr
Wed Apr 1 05:07:05 PDT 2015
On 27/03/2015 21:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> That's one scenario. Here's the scenario Mark is describing - one which
> has real-world examples:
>
> Hardware engineer picks address A for rev A and sets CP15 to address A.
> Everything works. Hardware engineer then picks address B for rev B, but
> forgets to update CP15. It breaks.
The hardware engineer told me that whatever arbitrary value is chosen
for PERIPH_BASE is automatically exported through CP15 (which is how
I thought this worked). So there is no "forgetting to update CP15"
(for this platform, at least).
> If it's in DT, it can be fixed. It should be there anyway as part of
> the hardware description. DT is a description of the hardware.
I thought DT was supposed to describe hardware that /cannot/ be probed
or discovered at run-time?
If everything could be probed at run-time, what would be the point of DT?
(For my own reference, DT on x86)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1104014
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
Regards.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list