[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add a clocks property to the simple-framebuffer binding
Mike Turquette
mturquette at linaro.org
Sun Sep 28 11:37:05 PDT 2014
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
> A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmware /
> bootloader. Such a framebuffer may have a number of clocks in use, add a
> property to communicate this to the OS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
or
Reviewed-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
I don't know what is the right thing with these binding definitions...
Also I have one suggestion below:
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt
> index 70c26f3..e75478e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/simple-framebuffer.txt
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Required properties:
> - r5g6b5 (16-bit pixels, d[15:11]=r, d[10:5]=g, d[4:0]=b).
> - a8b8g8r8 (32-bit pixels, d[31:24]=a, d[23:16]=b, d[15:8]=g, d[7:0]=r).
>
> +Optional properties:
> +- clocks : List of clocks used by the framebuffer
> +
> Example:
>
> framebuffer {
It might be nice to add the clocks property to the example. Something like:
clocks = <&osc 1>, <&ref 0>;
Regards,
Mike
> --
> 2.1.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list