[PATCH v1] rtc: snvs: add poweroff function
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at freescale.com
Thu Sep 25 18:24:11 PDT 2014
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:13:53AM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
> On i.mx6 chips, PMIC_ON_REQ can be pulled by snvs LPCR. That can be
> used poweroff system if PMIC_ON_REQ connected with external PMIC or
> power control circuit.Power up again if PMIC_ON_REQ pulled high.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <b38343 at freescale.com>
I'm not sure it's a good idea to plug poweroff support into RTC driver.
If RTC driver is built out, poweroff function is gone too.
Shawn
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.txt | 4 ++++
> drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.txt
> index e402277..00d67f2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.txt
> @@ -363,11 +363,15 @@ Secure Non-Volatile Storage (SNVS) Low Power (LP) RTC Node
> Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> Definition: A standard property. Specifies the physical
> address and length of the SNVS LP configuration registers.
> + - fsl,poweroff
> + Usage: opertional, recommend if PMIC_ON_REQ connected with external
> + PMIC or power control circuit.
>
> EXAMPLE
> sec_mon_rtc_lp at 314000 {
> compatible = "fsl,sec-v4.0-mon-rtc-lp";
> reg = <0x34 0x58>;
> + fsl,poweroff;
> };
>
> =====================================================================
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
> index fa384fe..ef32541 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> #define SNVS_LPCR_SRTC_ENV (1 << 0)
> #define SNVS_LPCR_LPTA_EN (1 << 1)
> #define SNVS_LPCR_LPWUI_EN (1 << 3)
> +#define SNVS_LPCR_DP (1 << 5)
> +#define SNVS_LPCR_TOP (1 << 6)
> #define SNVS_LPSR_LPTA (1 << 0)
>
> #define SNVS_LPPGDR_INIT 0x41736166
> @@ -41,6 +43,8 @@ struct snvs_rtc_data {
> spinlock_t lock;
> };
>
> +static void __iomem *snvs_base;
> +
> static u32 rtc_read_lp_counter(void __iomem *ioaddr)
> {
> u64 read1, read2;
> @@ -241,8 +245,17 @@ static irqreturn_t snvs_rtc_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return events ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> +static void snvs_poweroff(void)
> +{
> + u32 value;
> +
> + value = readl(snvs_base + SNVS_LPCR);
> + writel(value | SNVS_LPCR_DP | SNVS_LPCR_TOP, snvs_base + SNVS_LPCR);
> +}
> +
> static int snvs_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct snvs_rtc_data *data;
> struct resource *res;
> int ret;
> @@ -260,6 +273,11 @@ static int snvs_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (data->irq < 0)
> return data->irq;
>
> + if (np && of_get_property(np, "fsl,poweroff", NULL)) {
> + snvs_base = data->ioaddr;
> + pm_power_off = snvs_poweroff;
> + }
> +
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
>
> spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list