[PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be page aligned
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Sep 25 07:31:42 PDT 2014
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:00:02AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 08:09:47AM +0100, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > this patch extend the start and end address of initrd to be page aligned,
> > so that we can free all memory including the un-page aligned head or tail
> > page of initrd, if the start or end address of initrd are not page
> > aligned, the page can't be freed by free_initrd_mem() function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang at sonymobile.com>
>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
>
> (as I said, if Russell doesn't have any objections please send the patch
> to his patch system)
I now have an objection. The patches in the emails were properly formatted.
The patches which were submitted to the patch system (there's two of them
doing the same thing...) are not:
--- ../kernel.torvalds.git.origin/arch/arm/mm/init.c 2014-09-24 16:24:06.863759000 +0800
+++ arch/arm/mm/init.c 2014-09-24 16:27:11.455456000 +0800
This is totally broken. Let's read the patch(1) man page:
First, patch takes an ordered list of candidate file names as follows:
· If the header is that of a context diff, patch takes the old and new
file names in the header. A name is ignored if it does not have
enough slashes to satisfy the -pnum or --strip=num option. The name
/dev/null is also ignored.
· If there is an Index: line in the leading garbage and if either the
old and new names are both absent or if patch is conforming to
POSIX, patch takes the name in the Index: line.
· For the purpose of the following rules, the candidate file names are
considered to be in the order (old, new, index), regardless of the
order that they appear in the header.
Then patch selects a file name from the candidate list as follows:
· If some of the named files exist, patch selects the first name if
conforming to POSIX, and the best name otherwise.
...
· If no named files exist, no RCS, ClearCase, Perforce, or SCCS master
was found, some names are given, patch is not conforming to POSIX,
and the patch appears to create a file, patch selects the best name
requiring the creation of the fewest directories.
· If no file name results from the above heuristics, you are asked for
the name of the file to patch, and patch selects that name.
...
NOTES FOR PATCH SENDERS
There are several things you should bear in mind if you are going to be
sending out patches.
...
If the recipient is supposed to use the -pN option, do not send output
that looks like this:
diff -Naur v2.0.29/prog/README prog/README
--- v2.0.29/prog/README Mon Mar 10 15:13:12 1997
+++ prog/README Mon Mar 17 14:58:22 1997
because the two file names have different numbers of slashes, and dif-
ferent versions of patch interpret the file names differently. To
avoid confusion, send output that looks like this instead:
diff -Naur v2.0.29/prog/README v2.0.30/prog/README
--- v2.0.29/prog/README Mon Mar 10 15:13:12 1997
+++ v2.0.30/prog/README Mon Mar 17 14:58:22 1997
So I'm going to reject this crap.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list