[GIT PULL] at91: drivers for 3.18 #2 (bis)
olof at lixom.net
Wed Sep 24 10:34:53 PDT 2014
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:50:02PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 24/09/2014 06:59, Olof Johansson :
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
> >> I re-send this pull-request with the work done by Maxime to take Arnd's
> >> comments into annount: removal of the early_platform devices, and by keeping
> >> the old mechanism with a function exported by the PIT timer and called by the
> >> board files.
> >> Here is the old message that I sent you: just as a reference.
> >> "
> >> This pull-request is focused on the work that Maxime did for migrating our
> >> timer (PIT) to the clocksource sub-system. A big cleanup happened which allows
> >> us to be even closer to the point when we have only the bare minimum in our
> >> formerly crowded mach-at91 directory.
> >> "
> >> This pull-request goes on top of what is already in your at91/drivers branch.
> >> Thanks, best regards,
> >> The following changes since commit 405a72c5e78b5c560c8b2711d4000fa5eb063e1b:
> >> power: reset: at91-poweroff: fix wakeup status register index (2014-09-01 18:40:44 +0200)
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-drivers2
> >> for you to fetch changes up to b052ff30cd450c91a32e8e928979bca021462996:
> >> ARM: at91: PIT: Move the driver to drivers/clocksource (2014-09-15 17:55:48 +0200)
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Second drivers series for AT91/3.18:
> >> - move of the PIT (basic timer) from mach-at91 to its proper location:
> >> drivers/clocksource
> >> - big cleanup of this driver along the way
> > Thanks, merged.
> Thanks Olof, but there is a merge issue in the merge commit
> 58c19114886d5352c019979b84f5375970d81f05 (Merge branch 'next/drivers'
> into for-next). In fact the sama5_dt_timer_init() and
> ksz9021rn_phy_fixup() functions must be completely removed in this
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c file.
Thanks, fixed up.
> This is causing the errors seen in your and Kevin's buildbots:
Yeah, it's what I get for doing this when tired. :-) I didn't stay up to check build results.
> I pushed a branch for conflict resolutions here:
> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git at91-3.18-resolved2
All good, I've fixed it up with an incremental commit on our for-next,
so we'll just keep an eye on it when we send it up.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel