[GIT PULL] soc: Keystone SOC Navigator drivers for 3.18

[Olof Johansson]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:13:54PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Hi Arm-soc folks,
> 
> Please pull below Keystone SOC drivers. They have been on the list for review
> for last few merge windows. I got handful of comments on DTS bindings which
> has been already addressed. This should ungate me to get network support for
> Keystone which is missing in mainline.
> 
> The following changes since commit 7d1311b93e58ed55f3a31cc8f94c4b8fe988a2b9:
> 
>   Linux 3.17-rc1 (2014-08-16 10:40:26 -0600)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux-keystone.git tags/drivers-soc-ti
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to e9e7494bdcc7926237823253707691d0f3787be2:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS: Add Keystone Multicore Navigator drivers entry (2014-09-04 16:40:16 -0400)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Keystone SOC Navigator drivers for 3.18
> 
> The Keystone Multi-core Navigator contains QMSS and packet DMA
> subsystems which interwork together to form the Navigator cloud
> used by various subsystems like NetCP, SRIO, SideBand Crypto
> engines etc.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Sandeep Nair (3):
>       firmware: add Keystone QMSS PDSP accumulator firmware blob
>       Documentation: dt: soc: add Keystone Navigator QMSS bindings
>       soc: ti: add Keystone Navigator QMSS driver
> 
> Santosh Shilimkar (3):
>       Documentation: dt: soc: add Keystone Navigator DMA bindings
>       soc: ti: add Keystone Navigator DMA support
>       MAINTAINERS: Add Keystone Multicore Navigator drivers entry

Hi Santosh,

I was going through the queue of merges to do and it seems like Arnd
missed this one.

Before I merge it though -- it looks like the firmware should be added to
the linux-firmware repository instead? We try to avoid adding new firmware
files in the kernel tree these days and get them from there instead...

Can you respin with that fixed, or should I cherry-pick the contents from
this branch instead (all but that patch)?


-Olof