[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: mt8135: Add pinctrl node for mt8135.

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Joe.C <srv_yingjoe.chen at mediatek.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 15:03 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 23 September 2014 11:39:05 Hongzhou. Yang wrote:
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_GPIO0 (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 0)
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_MSDC0_DAT7 (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 1)
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_EINT49 (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 2)
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_I2SOUT_DAT (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 3)
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_DAC_DAT_OUT (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 4)
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_PCM1_DO (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 5)
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_SPI1_MO (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 6)
>> > +#define MT8135_PIN_0_MSDC0_DAT7__FUNC_NALE (MT_PIN_NO(0) | 7)
>> > +
>>
>> This list looks like it just describes the hardware, I think it would
>> be better to put the values directly into the DT, rather than
>> using such macros.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for review.
> The intend for these macros is helpin pinctrl user to write DT node.
> With these macro, we could write like this for i2c0:
>
> mediatek,pinfunc = <MT8135_PIN_100_SDA0__FUNC_SDA0
>                         MT8135_PIN_101_SCL0__FUNC_SCL0>;
>
> We feel this is less error prone and easier to write than this:
>
> mediatek,pinfunc = <MT_PIN_FUNC(100, 1) MT_PIN_FUNC(101, 1)>


Since you've already imposed the following limit in the DT bindings:

  The mediatek,pinfunc can be either a single value or an array.
  If it is an array, that means all pins use same config in this node.

Maybe you could split the bindings into

  mediatek,pins = <1 2 3 4>;
  mediatek,func = <1>;  (or some macro)

Or better yet, since you've already defined all the function names
in the pinctrl driver, you could just match by name for the functions.
That makes it very verbose and explicit about what you specify.

That's how we do it for sunxi anyway. Of course we have all the pin
function documentation open, so users and reviewers alike can double
check. Just a suggestion. :)


Cheers
ChenYu