[PATCH v11 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI domain_nr
Liviu.Dudau at arm.com
Mon Sep 22 08:33:12 PDT 2014
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 04:25:13PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau at arm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:03:13PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:30:22AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >> > Add of_pci_get_domain_nr() to retrieve the PCI domain number
> >> > of a given device from DT. If the information is not present,
> >> > the function can be requested to allocate a new domain number.
> >> Is of_pci_get_domain_nr() used somewhere? If the use is in some future
> >> series, please mention it explicitly. I'm just trying to avoid merging
> >> unused code.
> > It is used in the arm64 specific patch that I have dropped out of my
> > pull request. After discussions with Catalin I will add the patch back
> > into the tree that you've pulled from as he is OK with your tree carrying
> > the whole package.
> > I need to ask for some guidance here: for addressing some of your comments
> > and Rob's I can add more patches in my v11 branch and you can pull them
> > when you think they are ready. But one of your comments was requesting
> > splitting a patch into two blocks - one that moves of_pci_range_to_resource()
> > into drivers/of/address.c and one that fixes it's behaviour - and I don't
> > know how you would like that handled. Should I revert the original patch
> > and add the new ones, or should I rebase the whole series into a different
> > branch that you can pull from?
> I guess the easiest thing is probably just to send a v12 series. I
> was hoping we were close enough for me to just hand-integrate minor
> tweaks into my branch, but I think that will just create more
OK, I will send v12 then with all the acquired ACKs and fixes.
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
More information about the linux-arm-kernel