[PATCH 1/2 V6] irqchip: gic: Add supports for ARM GICv2m MSI(-X)
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Mon Sep 15 12:26:20 PDT 2014
On Sun, Sep 14 2014 at 07:30:15 AM, "suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com> wrote:
Hi Suravee,
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit at amd.com>
>
> ARM GICv2m specification extends GICv2 to support MSI(-X) with
> a new set of register frame. This patch introduces support for
> the non-secure GICv2m register frame. Currently, GICV2m is available
> in certain version of GIC-400.
>
> The patch introduces a new property in ARM gic binding, the v2m subnode.
> It is optional.
Overall, this looks much better than the previous versions I've
reviewed. There is still a number of points I'd like to see addressed,
see below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit at amd.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland at arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier at arm.com>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon at arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 39 ++++
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 261 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 88 ++++++---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h | 51 +++++
> 6 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> index c7d2fa1..a461591 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -96,3 +96,42 @@ Example:
> <0x2c006000 0x2000>;
> interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>;
> };
> +
> +
> +* GICv2m extension for MSI/MSI-x support (Optional)
> +
> +Certain revision of GIC-400 supports MSI/MSI-x via V2M register frame.
> +This is enabled by specifying v2m sub-node.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- msi-controller : Identifies the node as an MSI controller.
> +
> +- reg : GICv2m MSI interface register base and size
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + interrupt-controller at e1101000 {
> + compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + interrupts = <1 8 0xf04>;
> + ranges = <0 0 0 0xe1100000 0 0x100000>;
> + reg = <0x0 0xe1110000 0 0x01000>,
> + <0x0 0xe112f000 0 0x02000>,
> + <0x0 0xe1140000 0 0x10000>,
> + <0x0 0xe1160000 0 0x10000>;
> + v2m0 {
I believe the convention is to have
v2m0 : v2m at 0x80000 {
> + msi-controller;
> + reg = <0x0 0x80000 0 0x1000>;
I think having a "compatible" property would be nice, and would help
handle variants if they ever happen.
> + };
> +
> + ....
> +
> + v2mN {
> + msi-controller;
> + reg = <0x0 0x90000 0 0x1000>;
> + };
> + };
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index b8632bf..ddb31ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ config ARM_GIC
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
>
> +config ARM_GIC_V2M
> + bool
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> + select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> + depends on ARM_GIC
> + depends on PCI && PCI_MSI
> +
> config GIC_NON_BANKED
> bool
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 73052ba..3bda951 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += irq-sun4i.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += irq-sunxi-nmi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SPEAR3XX) += spear-shirq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC) += irq-gic.o irq-gic-common.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V2M) += irq-gic-v2m.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3) += irq-gic-v3.o irq-gic-common.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_NVIC) += irq-nvic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VIC) += irq-vic.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..499bfb9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
> +/*
> + * ARM GIC v2m MSI(-X) support
> + * Support for Message Signaled Interrupts for systems that
> + * implement ARM Generic Interrupt Controller: GICv2m.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + * Authors: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com>
> + * Harish Kasiviswanathan <harish.kasiviswanathan at amd.com>
> + * Brandon Anderson <brandon.anderson at amd.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published
> + * by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "GICv2m: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +#include "irqchip.h"
> +#include "irq-gic.h"
> +
> +/*
> +* MSI_TYPER:
> +* [31:26] Reserved
> +* [25:16] lowest SPI assigned to MSI
> +* [15:10] Reserved
> +* [9:0] Numer of SPIs assigned to MSI
> +*/
> +#define V2M_MSI_TYPER 0x008
> +#define V2M_MSI_TYPER_BASE_SHIFT 16
> +#define V2M_MSI_TYPER_BASE_MASK 0x3FF
> +#define V2M_MSI_TYPER_NUM_MASK 0x3FF
> +#define V2M_MSI_SETSPI_NS 0x040
> +#define V2M_MIN_SPI 32
> +#define V2M_MAX_SPI 1019
> +
> +/*
> + * alloc_msi_irq - Allocate MSIs from available MSI bitmap.
> + * @data: Pointer to v2m_data
> + * @nvec: Number of interrupts to allocate
> + * @irq: Pointer to the allocated irq
> + *
> + * Allocates interrupts only if the contiguous range of MSIs
> + * with specified nvec are available. Otherwise return the number
> + * of available interrupts. If none are available, then returns -ENOENT.
> + */
> +static int alloc_msi_irq(struct v2m_data *data, int nvec, int *irq)
> +{
> + int size = data->nr_spis;
> + int next = size, i = nvec, ret;
> +
> + /* We should never allocate more than available nr_spis */
> + if (i >= size)
> + i = size;
> +
> + spin_lock(&data->msi_cnt_lock);
> +
> + for (; i > 0; i--) {
> + next = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(data->bm,
> + size, 0, i, 0);
> + if (next < size)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (i != nvec) {
> + ret = i ? : -ENOENT;
> + } else {
> + bitmap_set(data->bm, next, nvec);
> + *irq = data->spi_start + next;
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&data->msi_cnt_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void gicv2m_teardown_msi_irq(struct msi_chip *chip, unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + int pos;
> + struct v2m_data *data = container_of(chip, struct v2m_data, msi_chip);
> +
> + spin_lock(&data->msi_cnt_lock);
> +
> + pos = irq - data->spi_start;
> + if (pos >= 0 && pos < data->nr_spis)
> + bitmap_clear(data->bm, pos, 1);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&data->msi_cnt_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static int gicv2m_setup_msi_irq(struct msi_chip *chip,
> + struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct msi_desc *desc)
> +{
> + int irq, avail;
> + struct msi_msg msg;
> + phys_addr_t addr;
> + struct v2m_data *data = container_of(chip, struct v2m_data, msi_chip);
> +
> + if (!desc) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "GICv2m: MSI setup failed. Invalid msi descriptor\n");
Isn't the "GICv2m" header already provided by the pr_fmt at the
beginning of the file?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + avail = alloc_msi_irq(data, 1, &irq);
> + if (avail != 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "GICv2m: MSI setup failed. Cannnot allocate IRQ\n");
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, chip);
> + irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
> + irq_set_irq_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
> +
> + addr = data->res.start + V2M_MSI_SETSPI_NS;
> + msg.address_hi = (u32)(addr >> 32);
> + msg.address_lo = (u32)(addr);
> + msg.data = irq;
> + write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void gicv2m_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + gic_mask_irq(d);
> + if (d->msi_desc)
> + mask_msi_irq(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void gicv2m_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + gic_unmask_irq(d);
> + if (d->msi_desc)
> + unmask_msi_irq(d);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
I think you can loose the CONFIG_OF here. There is no valid
configuration without OF on arm64.
> +
> +static int __init
> +v2m_init(struct device_node *node, struct v2m_data *v2m,
> + struct resource *res)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + unsigned int typer;
> +
> + v2m->msi_chip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + v2m->msi_chip.of_node = node;
> + v2m->msi_chip.setup_irq = gicv2m_setup_msi_irq;
> + v2m->msi_chip.teardown_irq = gicv2m_teardown_msi_irq;
> + ret = of_pci_msi_chip_add(&v2m->msi_chip);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_info("Failed to add msi_chip.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + v2m->base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> + if (!v2m->base) {
> + pr_err("Failed to map GICv2m resource\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
Beware, you're leaving with a registered msi_chip. You probably want to
remove it on the error path.
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(&v2m->res, res, sizeof(struct resource));
> +
> + typer = readl_relaxed(v2m->base + V2M_MSI_TYPER);
> + if (!typer) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to read V2M_MSI_TYPER register\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
And here leaving the v2m widget mapped.
> + }
> +
> + v2m->spi_start = (typer >> V2M_MSI_TYPER_BASE_SHIFT) &
> + V2M_MSI_TYPER_BASE_MASK;
> + v2m->nr_spis = typer & V2M_MSI_TYPER_NUM_MASK;
> + if ((v2m->spi_start < V2M_MIN_SPI) || (v2m->nr_spis >= V2M_MAX_SPI)) {
> + pr_err("Invalid MSI_TYPER (%#x)\n", typer);
> + return -EINVAL;
Blah. The whole error handling of this function is b0rked.
> + }
> +
> + v2m->bm = kzalloc(sizeof(long) * BITS_TO_LONGS(v2m->nr_spis),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!v2m->bm) {
> + pr_err("Failed to allocate MSI bitmap\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&v2m->msi_cnt_lock);
> +
> + pr_info("SPI range [%d:%d]\n",
> + v2m->spi_start, (v2m->spi_start + v2m->nr_spis));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init gicv2m_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> + struct irq_chip *v2m_chip)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct v2m_data *v2m;
> + struct resource res;
> + struct device_node *child = NULL;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gic->v2m_list);
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + child = of_get_next_child(node, child);
I don't see any of_node_put() in this function. You'll need to fix
this...
> + if (!child)
> + break;
> +
> + if (!of_find_property(child, "msi-controller", NULL))
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = of_address_to_resource(child, 0, &res);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Failed to allocate v2m resource.\n");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + v2m = kzalloc(sizeof(struct v2m_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!v2m) {
> + pr_err("Failed to allocate struct v2m_data.\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + ret = v2m_init(child, v2m, &res);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + v2m->gic = gic;
> +
> + pr_info(" %s: [%lx : %lx]\n", child->name,
> + (unsigned long)res.start, (unsigned long)res.end);
> +
> + list_add_tail(&v2m->list, &gic->v2m_list);
> + }
> +
> + if (ret && list_empty(&gic->v2m_list)) {
> + pr_err("MSI resource not found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + v2m_chip->irq_mask = gicv2m_mask_irq;
> + v2m_chip->irq_unmask = gicv2m_unmask_irq;
> +
Again, the whole error handling is evil. You can end-up allocating a few
v2m structures, registering them, and yet have kzalloc failing at some
point. At that stage, you exit early, not setting the mas/unmask
methods. Boom.
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 4b959e6..f490599 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -46,30 +46,9 @@
> #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>
> #include "irq-gic-common.h"
> +#include "irq-gic.h"
> #include "irqchip.h"
>
> -union gic_base {
> - void __iomem *common_base;
> - void __percpu * __iomem *percpu_base;
> -};
> -
> -struct gic_chip_data {
> - union gic_base dist_base;
> - union gic_base cpu_base;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> - u32 saved_spi_enable[DIV_ROUND_UP(1020, 32)];
> - u32 saved_spi_conf[DIV_ROUND_UP(1020, 16)];
> - u32 saved_spi_target[DIV_ROUND_UP(1020, 4)];
> - u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_enable;
> - u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_conf;
> -#endif
> - struct irq_domain *domain;
> - unsigned int gic_irqs;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> - void __iomem *(*get_base)(union gic_base *);
> -#endif
> -};
> -
> static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
>
> /*
> @@ -131,15 +110,36 @@ static inline void gic_set_base_accessor(struct gic_chip_data *data,
> #define gic_set_base_accessor(d, f)
> #endif
>
> +static inline
> +struct gic_chip_data *irq_data_get_gic_chip_data(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct gic_chip_data *gic_data;
> + struct msi_chip *mchip;
> + struct v2m_data *v2mdat;
> +
> + /*
> + * For MSI, irq_data.chip_data points to struct msi_chip.
> + * For non-MSI, irq_data.chip_data points to struct gic_chip_data.
> + */
> + if (d->msi_desc) {
> + mchip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + v2mdat = container_of(mchip, struct v2m_data, msi_chip);
> + gic_data = v2mdat->gic;
> + } else {
> + gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + }
> + return gic_data;
> +}
> +
> static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_gic_chip_data(d);
> return gic_data_dist_base(gic_data);
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *gic_cpu_base(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_gic_chip_data(d);
> return gic_data_cpu_base(gic_data);
> }
>
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> /*
> * Routines to acknowledge, disable and enable interrupts
> */
> -static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
I'm still very uncomfortable with exporting the mask/unmask methods
outside of this file... Maybe it is not a big deal, but I see evil
everywhere.
> {
> u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
>
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> }
>
> -static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
>
> @@ -325,6 +325,15 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
> .irq_set_wake = gic_set_wake,
> };
>
> +static struct irq_chip v2m_chip = {
> + .name = "GICv2m",
> + .irq_eoi = gic_eoi_irq,
> + .irq_set_type = gic_set_type,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .irq_set_affinity = gic_set_affinity,
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
> {
> if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> @@ -767,6 +776,24 @@ void __init gic_init_physaddr(struct device_node *node)
> static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> irq_hw_number_t hw)
> {
> + struct gic_chip_data *gic = d->host_data;
> + struct v2m_data *v2m;
> +
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V2M
> + list_for_each_entry(v2m, &gic->v2m_list, list) {
> + if (hw >= v2m->spi_start &&
> + hw < v2m->spi_start + v2m->nr_spis) {
> +
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &v2m_chip,
> + handle_fasteoi_irq);
> + set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (hw < 32) {
> irq_set_percpu_devid(irq);
> irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip,
> @@ -779,7 +806,6 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>
> gic_routable_irq_domain_ops->map(d, irq, hw);
> }
> - irq_set_chip_data(irq, d->host_data);
These two hunks make the code a bit hard to read:
- First, message-based SPIs,
- Then PPIs
- and finally the rest of the SPIs.
Can you come up with a construct that keeps everything in a logical
order (PPIs, and then SPIs)? Not a big deal but it would make the code
nicer.
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -996,7 +1022,7 @@ gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> void __iomem *cpu_base;
> void __iomem *dist_base;
> u32 percpu_offset;
> - int irq;
> + int irq, ret;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!node))
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -1010,6 +1036,12 @@ gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpu-offset", &percpu_offset))
> percpu_offset = 0;
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V2M)) {
> + ret = gicv2m_of_init(node, &gic_data[gic_cnt], &v2m_chip);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_warn("Warning: Failed to enable GICv2m support.\n");
> + }
> +
> gic_init_bases(gic_cnt, -1, dist_base, cpu_base, percpu_offset, node);
> if (!gic_cnt)
> gic_init_physaddr(node);
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1f4a2b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +#ifndef _IRQ_GIC_H_
> +#define _IRQ_GIC_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +
> +union gic_base {
> + void __iomem *common_base;
> + void __percpu * __iomem *percpu_base;
> +};
> +
> +struct gic_chip_data;
> +
> +struct v2m_data {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V2M
> + struct list_head list;
> + spinlock_t msi_cnt_lock;
> + struct msi_chip msi_chip;
> + struct resource res; /* GICv2m resource */
> + void __iomem *base; /* GICv2m virt address */
> + unsigned int spi_start; /* The SPI number that MSIs start */
> + unsigned int nr_spis; /* The number of SPIs for MSIs */
> + unsigned long *bm; /* MSI vector bitmap */
> + struct gic_chip_data *gic;
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> +struct gic_chip_data {
> + union gic_base dist_base;
> + union gic_base cpu_base;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> + u32 saved_spi_enable[DIV_ROUND_UP(1020, 32)];
> + u32 saved_spi_conf[DIV_ROUND_UP(1020, 16)];
> + u32 saved_spi_target[DIV_ROUND_UP(1020, 4)];
> + u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_enable;
> + u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_conf;
> +#endif
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + unsigned int gic_irqs;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> + void __iomem *(*get_base)(union gic_base *);
> +#endif
> + struct list_head v2m_list;
> +};
Maybe wrap this list_head around #ifdef/#endif?
> +
> +void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d);
> +void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d);
> +int gicv2m_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> + struct irq_chip *v2m_chip) __init;
> +
> +#endif /* _IRQ_GIC_H_ */
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list