[PATCH v2] iio: adc: at91: don't use the last converted data register
Ludovic Desroches
ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
Wed Sep 10 04:53:29 PDT 2014
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:54:37PM +0200, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> Ludovic Desroches schrieb, Am 08.09.2014 10:40:
> > If touchscreen mode is enabled and a conversion is requested on another
> > channel, the result in the last converted data register can be a
> > touchscreen relative value. Starting a conversion involves to do a
> > conversion for all active channel. It starts with ADC channels and ends
> > with touchscreen channels. Then if ADC_LCD register is not read quickly,
> > its content may be a touchscreen conversion.
> > To remove this temporal constraint, the conversion value is taken from
> > the channel data register.
> >
> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches at atmel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > - use GENMASK and BIT macros
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > index 3b5bacd..1812d12 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> > @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct at91_adc_state {
> > bool done;
> > int irq;
> > u16 last_value;
> > + int chnb;
> > struct mutex lock;
> > u8 num_channels;
> > void __iomem *reg_base;
> > @@ -274,7 +275,7 @@ void handle_adc_eoc_trigger(int irq, struct iio_dev *idev)
> > disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> > iio_trigger_poll(idev->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
> > } else {
> > - st->last_value = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_LCDR);
> > + st->last_value = at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_CHAN(st, st->chnb));
> > st->done = true;
> > wake_up_interruptible(&st->wq_data_avail);
> > }
> > @@ -351,7 +352,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_rl_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
> > unsigned int reg;
> >
> > status &= at91_adc_readl(st, AT91_ADC_IMR);
> > - if (status & st->registers->drdy_mask)
> > + if (status & GENMASK(st->num_channels, 0))
> You need to use st->num_channels - 1, since GENMASK starts counting from bit position 0.
Right, thanks to catch it, I was thinking channel number instead of
number of channels when writing it...
> > handle_adc_eoc_trigger(irq, idev);
> >
> > if (status & AT91RL_ADC_IER_PEN) {
> > @@ -418,7 +419,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_adc_9x5_interrupt(int irq, void *private)
> > AT91_ADC_IER_YRDY |
> > AT91_ADC_IER_PRDY;
> >
> > - if (status & st->registers->drdy_mask)
> > + if (status & GENMASK(st->num_channels, 0))
> Same here.
> > handle_adc_eoc_trigger(irq, idev);
> >
> > if (status & AT91_ADC_IER_PEN) {
> > @@ -689,9 +690,10 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> >
> > + st->chnb = chan->channel;
> > at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CHER,
> > AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> > - at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IER, st->registers->drdy_mask);
> > + at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IER, BIT(chan->channel));
> > at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CR, AT91_ADC_START);
> >
> > ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(st->wq_data_avail,
> > @@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ static int at91_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
> >
> > at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_CHDR,
> > AT91_ADC_CH(chan->channel));
> > - at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, st->registers->drdy_mask);
> > + at91_adc_writel(st, AT91_ADC_IDR, BIT(chan->channel));
> >
> > st->last_value = 0;
> > st->done = false;
> >
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list