[PATCH v6 4/4] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800

[Felipe Balbi]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:19:50AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> >> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
> >> >> > for that ? It looks like you could just as well do this from
> >> >> > phy_power_on() ?
> >> >>
> >> >> No, unfortunately keeping these calibration settings in phy_power_on()
> >> >> doesn't help, since we need to do this after XHCI reset has happened.
> >> >
> >> > teach xHCI about PHYs ?
> >>
> >> sorry i couldn't understand you here.
> >> Aren't we trying to do the same with Heikki's patch about dwc3 :
> >> [PATCH 6/6] usb: dwc3: host: convey the PHYs to xhci
> >>
> >> and the 2nd patch in this series :
> >> [PATCH v6 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Get PHYs for xhci's hcds
> >>
> >> Is there something else that is expected ?
> >
> > right, use that to call phy_init() at the right time, then you need to
> > add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely, will only be used by you
> > ;-)
> 
> so you mean, the xhci should itself call phy_init() at a time suitable,
> so that ->calibrate() is not required at all ?
> 
> i think you meant there - "then you __do not__ need to

right :-)

> > add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely,
> will only be used by you", is it ?

yup

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140909/cfa35ca9/attachment.sig>