[PATCHv3 1/6] ARM: dts: Add SoC level device tree support for LS1021A
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Sep 9 04:50:09 PDT 2014
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 17:12:27 Jingchang Lu wrote:
> + dcfg: dcfg at 1ee0000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcfg";
> + reg = <0x0 0x1ee0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> + };
> + scfg: scfg at 1570000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-scfg";
> + reg = <0x0 0x1570000 0x0 0x10000>;
> + };
Should these be marked as 'compatible = "syscon"' as well?
> + dcsr {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "fsl,dcsr", "simple-bus";
> +
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x20000000 0x1000000>;
> +
> + dcsr-epu at 0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-epu";
> + reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
> + };
The binding document only specifies a generic "fsl,dcsr-epu", not
"fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-epu". It also mandates that "interrupts"
must be present and contain three interrupt lines.
Please fix either the DT or the binding, so they match.
> + dcsr-gdi at 100000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-gdi";
> + reg = <0x100000 0x10000>;
> + };
> +
> + dcsr-dddi at 120000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-dddi";
> + reg = <0x120000 0x10000>;
> + };
> +
> + dcsr-dcfg at 220000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-dcfg";
> + reg = <0x220000 0x1000>;
> + };
> +
> + dcsr-clock at 221000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-clock";
> + reg = <0x221000 0x1000>;
> + };
None of these are part of the dcsr.txt binding.
> + dcsr-rcpm at 222000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-rcpm";
> + reg = <0x222000 0x1000 0x223000 0x1000>;
> + };
Missing generic fsl,dcsr-rcpm compatible value again.
> + dcsr-ccp at 225000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-ccp";
> + reg = <0x225000 0x1000>;
> + };
I'm not checking any devices below this one, I assume they are mostly
incomplete, so please go through the whole list and make sure they
all match the documentation.
I can't really find any code using the dcsr in Linux. Is there
an out of tree driver that you plan to submit?
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list