[PATCH v3 2/9] PM / Domains: Add generic OF-based PM domain look-up

[Ulf Hansson]

On 8 September 2014 23:04, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Monday, September 08, 2014 09:26:20 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 8 September 2014 00:13, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, September 04, 2014 03:52:29 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >> From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
>> >>
>> >> This patch introduces generic code to perform PM domain look-up using
>> >> device tree and automatically bind devices to their PM domains.
>> >>
>> >> Generic device tree bindings are introduced to specify PM domains of
>> >> devices in their device tree nodes.
>> >>
>> >> Backwards compatibility with legacy Samsung-specific PM domain bindings
>> >> is provided, but for now the new code is not compiled when
>> >> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS is selected to avoid collision with legacy code.
>> >> This will change as soon as the Exynos PM domain code gets converted to
>> >> use the generic framework in further patch.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
>> >> [Ulf:Added attach|detach functions, fixed review comments]
>> >> Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel at pengutronix.de>
>> >
>> > However, for this one (and consequently the rest) I need an ACK from the
>> > people who maintain the bindings.
>>
>> These DT bindings have been discussed between Tomasz and devicetree
>> maintainers previously. So I think there are fine.
>>
>> Also, when browsing the mail-archives, I found an ack from Rob Herrring:
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/237989.html
>>
>> I realize that I didn't put the DT maintainers on the to-line when
>> posting this patch, but just the devicetree list. I have now included
>> them on this reply, but maybe I should repost instead. What do you
>> think? Are you happy with the above ack from Rob?
>
> That should be sufficient, but I wonder why you didn't add it to the patch
> to start with?

I didn't remember it being formally acked, until I decided to browsed
the mail archives in detail. Sorry about that.

Kind regards
Uffe