[PATCH v3 2/9] PM / Domains: Add generic OF-based PM domain look-up

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, September 08, 2014 09:26:20 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 8 September 2014 00:13, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 04, 2014 03:52:29 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
> >>
> >> This patch introduces generic code to perform PM domain look-up using
> >> device tree and automatically bind devices to their PM domains.
> >>
> >> Generic device tree bindings are introduced to specify PM domains of
> >> devices in their device tree nodes.
> >>
> >> Backwards compatibility with legacy Samsung-specific PM domain bindings
> >> is provided, but for now the new code is not compiled when
> >> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS is selected to avoid collision with legacy code.
> >> This will change as soon as the Exynos PM domain code gets converted to
> >> use the generic framework in further patch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
> >> [Ulf:Added attach|detach functions, fixed review comments]
> >> Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel at pengutronix.de>
> >
> > However, for this one (and consequently the rest) I need an ACK from the
> > people who maintain the bindings.
> 
> These DT bindings have been discussed between Tomasz and devicetree
> maintainers previously. So I think there are fine.
> 
> Also, when browsing the mail-archives, I found an ack from Rob Herrring:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/237989.html
> 
> I realize that I didn't put the DT maintainers on the to-line when
> posting this patch, but just the devicetree list. I have now included
> them on this reply, but maybe I should repost instead. What do you
> think? Are you happy with the above ack from Rob?

That should be sufficient, but I wonder why you didn't add it to the patch
to start with?

Rafael