[PATCH 1/2] arm64: psci: respect MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE

Ashwin Chaugule ashwin.chaugule at linaro.org
Mon Sep 8 07:25:47 PDT 2014


On 8 September 2014 10:14, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
>> >> Guessing there is no way for us to know which CPU the UP TOS is
>> >> running on and only deny hotplug on that CPU?
>> >
>> > In the comment above I mention we can use MIGRATE_INFO_UP_CPU for that.
>> > I started down that route, but the plumbing for it ended up looking a
>> > little crazy so I thought it was better for the moment to have a simple
>> > solution that we can backport to stable.
>>
>> Ah. I faintly recollect experiencing similar craziness when I was
>> adding v0.2 support.
>
> Yeah, it's lot of churny fun with many function prototypes changing
> about. I wasn't too keen on rushing that, though I would like to get
> around to it at some point.
>
>> > No systems with a UP trusted OS (migrateable or not) have hit my radar
>> > yet, and we're currently broken for them anyhow. So for the moment it
>> > didn't seem worthwhile implementing support for those. We can add the
>> > requisite MIGRATE_INFO_UP_CPU and MIGRATE calls in a later series.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> Acked-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule at linaro.org>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Does that apply to both patches or just the arm64 one?

Sorry, just looked at it. Please consider the ACK for both.

Thanks,
Ashwin



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list