[PATCH RESEND v5 1/5] usb: host: ehci-st: Add EHCI support for ST STB devices

Peter Griffin peter.griffin at linaro.org
Fri Sep 5 11:16:36 PDT 2014

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, 05 Sep 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Friday 05 September 2014 18:23:45 Peter Griffin wrote:
> > +struct st_platform_priv {
> > +       struct clk *clks[USB_MAX_CLKS];
> > +       struct clk *clk48;
> > +       struct reset_control *rst;
> > +       struct reset_control *pwr;
> > +       struct phy *phy;
> > +};
> Any reason why this is in a shared header file? It looks like
> duplicating the structure under two different names would
> actually be shorter and keep the drivers more readable as they'd
> be self-contained, even when they have the exact same structure.

The only reason was it was a identical structure so I put it in a shared
header file. I can unabstract it if you want?

> Do both drivers use all fields?

Yes they are. I thought the 48Mhz clock would only be used by ohci, but annoyingly it also
clocks the reset logic of the ehci block as well.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list