[PATCH] pinctrl: st: Add remove function and remove gpio_chip on failure
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at st.com
Fri Sep 5 00:27:35 PDT 2014
Hi Pramod, Srini
On 09/04/2014 08:08 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Pramod,
> sorry for delay in reply as I was travelling, still in Jet lag.
>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav at smartplayin.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
>> index 5475374..9296845 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
>> @@ -1517,6 +1517,7 @@ static int st_gpiolib_register_bank(struct
>> st_pinctrl *info,
>> 0, handle_simple_irq,
>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
>> if (err) {
>> + gpiochip_remove(&bank->gpio_chip);
> This change-set looks good.
> IMO, you can send a patch for this change set.
Removing the gpiochip here looks good to me too.
>
>> dev_info(dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
>> return err;
>> }
>> @@ -1685,6 +1686,29 @@ static int st_pctl_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
>> +static int st_pctl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
> Ideally this driver will not be removed, as other drivers depend on
> this, even the serial.
>
> so I see no big achievement in adding the remove functionality, as this
> is going to be a dead code and would never be tested.
Agree too.
Thanks,
Maxime
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list