[PATCH v3 0/6] Migrate PXA27x platforms to clock framework
mturquette at linaro.org
Thu Sep 4 12:29:43 PDT 2014
Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2014-09-03 12:33:31)
> On Wednesday 03 September 2014 11:49:56 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Right, makes sense. We have in the past done it either way for other
> > > platforms. When merging the patches through the clk subsystem, it still
> > > makes sense to let us know of those plans and ask for an Ack from
> > > the arm-soc maintainers, to be sure we can plan ahead in case there
> > > are other (conflicting) patch sets that are sent through arm-soc.
> > Do I have your Ack for the arch/arm patches?
> >  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<email@example.com>
> I have no objection to the change, but we might need to be careful in
> case we get a lot of conflicts.
> How about making it a shared branch that you plan to send upstream
> but that we can also include in arm-soc to avoid conflicts if necessary?
Sounds good. I'll probably need to perform a bit of surgery on my tree
and rebase it in order to have the minimum set of patches that get
pulled into arm-soc.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel