[PATCH v3 0/6] Migrate PXA27x platforms to clock framework

Mike Turquette mturquette at linaro.org
Wed Sep 3 11:49:56 PDT 2014

Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2014-08-24 05:08:19)
> On Sunday 24 August 2014, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > > By default, I'd expect Haojian to pick up the patches and send
> > > us a pull request. He sent an Ack, but also didn't make it clear
> > > that we should pick them up.
> > I was thinking that they would go through the clk maintainers, hence Haojian's
> > ack. If they should go through arm-soc, they would need Mike's ack.


I'm happy to take the patches but they will need to be rebased onto
clk-next and refactored to take into account Tomeu's api split[0].

> Right, makes sense. We have in the past done it either way for other
> platforms. When merging the patches through the clk subsystem, it still
> makes sense to let us know of those plans and ask for an Ack from
> the arm-soc maintainers, to be sure we can plan ahead in case there
> are other (conflicting) patch sets that are sent through arm-soc.


Do I have your Ack for the arch/arm patches?

[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1409758148-20104-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>


>         Arnd

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list