[Patch v3] 0/7] Remove mach-kirkwood

Rafael J. Wysocki rjw at rjwysocki.net
Mon Sep 1 16:46:36 PDT 2014


On Monday, September 01, 2014 04:03:20 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:56:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 30, 2014 06:46:05 PM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > This is mostly a resend of these patches, removing mach-kirkwood.  Not
> > > all maintainers picked up there patches, which has resulted in some
> > > dead kernel configuration in v3.17-rcX.
> > > 
> > > The patch set has been rebased on v3.17-rc2, and it is intended that
> > > Jason Cooper will submit them for inclusion in an RC. Subsystem
> > > maintainers do not need to do anything.
> > > 
> > > The last patch "cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency" is new,
> > > since what it is removing was added during v3.16-rcX. It follows the
> > > pattern of all the other patches.
> > > 
> > > Andrew Lunn (7):
> > >   cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > >   ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > >   thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > >   leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > >   rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > >   watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > >   cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency
> > 
> > I have no problems with these changes, but what exactly am I supposed to do?
> 
> Jason will submit the whole series. So an Acked-by: would be nice.

OK, so please regard the cpuidle and cpufreq patches as ACKed.

Rafael




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list