[PATCH 11/15] sound: soc: poodle: make use of new locomo GPIO interface

[Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov]

2014-10-31 12:52 GMT+03:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:02:04AM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>>> Since LoCoMo driver has been converted to provide proper gpiolib
>>>> interface, make poodle ASoC platform driver use gpiolib API.
>>>
>>> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.
>>>
>>>> +     ret = gpio_request_array(poodle_gpios, ARRAY_SIZE(poodle_gpios));
>>>> +     if (ret) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "gpio_request_array() failed: %d\n",
>>>> +                             ret);
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +     }
>>>
>>> I sense a need for devm_gpio_request_array() here.  Otherwise this looks
>>> fine - ideally it'd move to gpiod but moving to gpiolib is a clear win
>>> so no need to block on this.
>>
>> I wish Dmitry took the opportunity to move this driver to the gpiod
>> API, especially since doing so would be trivial for this driver.
>
> +1 on this.
>
> However this platform is not device tree, so this implies setting up
> a descriptor table for the affected driver(s) to work properly.
> See Documentation/gpio/board.txt

I checked the gpiod interfaces after original suggestion by Alexandre.

Introducing those mapping tables (much like pinctrl tables) look like
a duplicate effort if Russell will permit adding a DT support. So
I thought that I will reconsider gpiod/pinctrl/etc after fixing
LoCoMo, reiterating IRQ patches, possibly switching to COMMON_CLK
and (finally) thinking about device tree support.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry