[PATCH 1/2] [usb] make xhci platform driver use 64 bit or 32 bit DMA
Mark Langsdorf
mlangsdo at redhat.com
Thu Oct 30 13:09:33 PDT 2014
On 10/30/2014 02:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 30 October 2014 13:16:28 Mark Langsdorf wrote:
>> - /* Initialize dma_mask and coherent_dma_mask to 32-bits */
>> - ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + /* Try setting the coherent_dma_mask to 64 bits, then try 32 bits */
>> + if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) < 8 ||
>> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
>> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask)
>> pdev->dev.dma_mask = &pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
>> else
>> - dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> + dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask);
>>
>> hcd = usb_create_hcd(driver, &pdev->dev, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
>> if (!hcd)
>>
>
> The logic here seems wrong: if dma_set_mask is successful, you
> can rely on on dma_set_coherent_mask suceeding as well, but
> not the other way round.
That's the order in the existing driver. Would you prefer I
switch it to:
if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) < 8 ||
dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
ret = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (ret)
return ret;
}
dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.dma_mask);
or based on the comment below:
ret = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.dma_mask);
if (ret)
return ret;
dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.dma_mask);
I prefer this version but I don't know if it would work.
> Also, we should no longer need to worry about the case where
> pdev->dev.dma_mask is NULL, as this now gets initialized from
> the DT setup.
I'm running this on a system with ACPI enabled and no DT. Does
that make a difference?
--Mark Langsdorf
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list