[PATCH v5 3/4] regulator: max77686: Add suspend disable for some LDOs
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Wed Oct 29 03:01:42 PDT 2014
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On wto, 2014-10-28 at 22:31 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This looks wrong, you're using the regular enable operation as suspend
> > enable. How does that work without disrupting the current runtime
> > state?
> Currently it shouldn't disrupt state of regulator because during runtime
> it may only be only: on (0x3) or off (0x0). Suspend enable in max77686
> writes 0x3 to the register which means - always on.
> If regulator was disabled before suspend then it has to be enabled
> during suspend_enable() call which is exactly what max77686_enable does.
> If it was enabled then nothing happens.
No, this isn't suspend enable control - this is normal, standard enable
control and the device has no suspend enable control.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141029/7504a43a/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list