[PATCH 00/10] arm64 EFI patches for 3.19

[Matt Fleming]

On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 13:03 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I was struggling a bit with that. I think the agreement was that
> everything EFI related goes through Matt's tree, but I don't think
> that necessarily makes sense for patches that only touch arch/arm64,
> unless there are interdependencies with the generic code.
> 
> From this series, only patches #7 and #8 need to go through Matt's
> tree, and even if #9 and #10 are also related to SMBIOS, they are in
> fact orthogonal to #7 and #8, so those can still go through the arm64
> tree without any merge order issues later on.
> 
> @Matt: any thoughts?

In this case, if it makes things easier for you folks in terms of
dependencies to take this *all* through the arm64 tree, that seems
sensible to me.