[PATCH v8 0/7] QCOM 8974 and 8084 cpuidle driver

[Ivan T. Ivanov]

On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 08:30 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24 2014 at 04:01 -0600, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > >
> > >On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 09:54 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > >  On Thu, Oct 23 2014 at 09:31 -0600, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 15:41 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> > > > >   Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > >   This v8 revision of the cpuidle driver is available at
> > > > >   git.linaro.org:/people/lina.iyer/linux-next cpuidle-v8
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Probably I missing something, but should I expect that
> > > > > >once these patches are applied driver could be successfully
> > > >   compiled?
> > >  Yes they should.
> > >
> > >Do these patches depends on other patches, which I am missing.
> > >I am applying them on current linus/master. At least 
> > 
> > >and <soc/qcom/scm-boot.h> are missing from this patch-set v8 :-|
> > >
> 
> Oh sorry, if you look at the cover letter, in the past, these patches
> have been pulled in or being staged.
> 
> You can get the tree and the the patches from

> https://git.linaro.org/people/lina.iyer/linux-next.git/shortlog/refs/heads/cpuidle-v8
> 
> which are on top of 3.17-rc1, but you should be able to pull it on 
> top
> of yours, without any issue. Do note that some of these patches that 
> I
> have on top of 3.17-rc1 (like the ARM idle states) may already be
> available in linus/master.
> 
> Hope that helps.

Yep, this is better.

Thank you,
Ivan