[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: sun7i: Add lradc node
Maxime Ripard
maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Wed Oct 22 01:38:02 PDT 2014
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:24:50AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 7 ++++
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts
> index 9d669cdf..85e7194 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> /dts-v1/;
> /include/ "sun7i-a20.dtsi"
> /include/ "sunxi-common-regulators.dtsi"
> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
I'm just wondering... Weren't we supposed to switch all includes to
the preprocessor syntax in such a case?
Maybe to handle the case were the DTSIs would have to use some
preprocessors macros that wouldn't be expanded in this case?
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141022/de46738a/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list