[PATCH] fix for certain sequnce of request_irq can cause irq storm
Evgeniy Dushistov
dushistov at mail.ru
Tue Oct 21 08:20:34 PDT 2014
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:15:51PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > I used custom board with mv78200 CPU.
>
> So you're still using the mainline kernel on this system?
Yes, we reuse old hardware design with new enougth (3.12) kernel.
>We were
> actually starting to consider getting rid of the support for this
> platform, since it doesn't receive much attention, and there are almost
> no systems supported in mainline that use this CPU.
>
> Are you actually using the two CPUs on mv78200 ? If so, in what
> configurations ?
>
We use several configurations, on some of them the second cpu is disabled,
on others the second CPU connected to the first via gigabit ethernet
(eth2<->eth3 in loopback like mode [I fixed one bug several years ago
about usage of such config, it should be in mainline]).
> Would you be willing to put some effort into moving mv78xx0 to the
> Device Tree, and all other modern subsystems (clock, pinmux, etc.) ?
>
At now I have several git branches for slightly different device
configurations, so I suppose support of Device Tree should simplify
things for me.
But I can only test it on mv78200 CPU, and only
compiled into the kernel, because of u-boot from marvell old enough(no
Device Tree support),
and not sure that mainstream u-boot support the usage of two cores.
--
/Evgeniy
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list