arm: JUMP_LABEL and DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX should be mutually exclusive?

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 08:34:17AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Paolo Pisati <p.pisati at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i keep hitting this with BRIDGE=m, JUMP_LABEL=y and DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX=y:
> 
> I think my RO/NX patch series solves this. I sent a pull request, but
> I haven't seen any movement on it. :(

Sorry Kees.

However, even if I had looked at it, I would /not/ have been able to
pull it.  It does the absolutely fatal thing for any pull request:

The following changes since commit cc31d8f887953e9824c4d9333b15c335ee7d1b65:

  Merge branches 'fiq' (early part), 'fixes' and 'misc' into for-next (2014-09-2+6 14:40:19 +0100)

That commit is on my "for-next" branch.  The clue is in the name. :)
Just like trying to base commits onto the linux-next tree, trying to
base commits on an aggregate branch intended for linux-next usage
doesn't work for all the same reasons.

The commit which ultimately ended up being merged was:

commit d5d16892243e7755da706d03b34da85ea6a74117
Merge: 3467e765a592 ad684dce87fa f3354ab67476 421520ba9829
Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu Oct 2 21:47:02 2014 +0100

    Merge branches 'fiq' (early part), 'fixes', 'l2c' (early part) and 'misc' into for-next

compared to the one you based on:

commit cc31d8f887953e9824c4d9333b15c335ee7d1b65
Merge: 3467e765a592 5ca918e5e3f9 e16343c47e42
Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri Sep 26 14:40:19 2014 +0100

    Merge branches 'fiq' (early part), 'fixes' and 'misc' into for-next

So, although "fiq" was the same, "fixes" had additional commits added,
an additional "l2c" branch was added, and two additional commits in "misc".

The reason why I publish a "for-next" branch is exactly so I don't have
to push out lots of individual branches, and then have to tell SFR which
branches he needs to pull on a regular basis.  "for-next" is an aggregate
unstable branch solely intended to be pulled into linux-next (and thus
inspected by others.)

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.