[PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes

[Jason Cooper]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 02:53:02AM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote:
> 
> Le 6 oct. 2014 à 18:13, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> > On 10/06/2014 01:11 AM, Benoit Masson wrote:
> >> Le 3 oct. 2014 à 17:41, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>> On 10/03/2014 05:29 PM, Benoit Masson wrote:
> >>>> Le 3 oct. 2014 à 17:06, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>>>> On 10/03/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Le 19 sept. 2014 à 22:14, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>>>> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in
> >>>>>>>> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit
> >>>>>>>> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> I'm not sure what to test since I only receive some patch from the
> >>>>>>> series of 8. Should I get all 8 or only those you sent me. I'll be
> >>>>>>> able to test during next week.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Did you ever get a chance to test this series?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Uhm, I never prepared a branch for Benoit to test. I have pushed the
> >>>>> patches with Thomas Acked-by's and renamed eeprom node based on
> >>>>> v3.17-rc1 to
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4
> >>>>> 
> >>> [...]
> >> Maybe I missed something ? is this branch you sent me a bare fork
> >> from mainline 3.17 ? does it includes the armada XP step A0 patch ?
> > 
> > Benoit,
> > 
> Hi,
> > I prepared more branches with the series
> > - on top of v3.17 release:
> > https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4_v3.17
> > 
> > - on top of next-20141003 (i.e. what will become v3.18-rc1):
> > https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4_next-20141003
> > 
> > It would be great, if you can test in this order:
> > - vanilla v3.17
> > - mvebu-ix4_v3.17
> > - mvebu-ix4_next-20141003
> > 
> All the 3 branch works WHEN APPLYING A0 patch (below), with both my custom kernel config and the arch/arm/configs/mvebu_v7_defconfig
> 
> The reason why it didn't worked last time was that apparently the A0 patch (copied) below was not merged into 3.17 :(
> 
> This means that ix4-300d support is broken on 3.17 because of the A0 stepping patch not merged.

Do you have a link to an email thread or the patch Subject line?  I can
confirm it's missing from mvebu/fixes...

thx,

Jason.

> patch (from Andrew Lunn Acked-by Gregory Clement is missing:
> 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
> index b2524d6..b1e148d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void __init thermal_quirk(void)
>  
>  static void __init mvebu_dt_init(void)
>  {
> -	if (of_machine_is_compatible("plathome,openblocks-ax3-4"))
> +	if (of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armadaxp"))
>  		i2c_quirk();
>  	if (of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,a375-db")) {
>  		external_abort_quirk();
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> > If any branch fails, you can stop and please report back.
> > 
> > I also have the ix4 but I need more time for a full setup like you
> > already seem to have ready. Again, there is no hurry, take your time.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Sebastian
>