[PATCH v7 6/7] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage

Vincent Guittot vincent.guittot at linaro.org
Fri Oct 10 00:18:23 PDT 2014


On 10 October 2014 09:17, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> yes i think it latter because it give a more stable view of the

s/latter/matter/

> "overload state" and "have  free capacity state" of the CPU.
> One additional point is that the imbalance_pct will ensure that a
> cpu/group will not been seen as having capacity if its available
> capacity is only 1-5% which will generate spurious task migration
>
> I will add these details in the commit log and in a comment in the code



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list