[PATCH v8 1/7] qcom: spm: Add Subsystem Power Manager driver

[Lina Iyer]

On Thu, Oct 09 2014 at 11:23 -0600, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
>On 09/10/14 18:12, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>On Thu, Oct 09 2014 at 10:53 -0600, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>On 07/10/14 22:41, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>>>SPM is a hardware block that controls the peripheral logic surrounding
>>>>the application cores (cpu/l$). When the core executes WFI instruction,
>>>>the SPM takes over the putting the core in low power state as
>>>>configured. The wake up for the SPM is an interrupt at the GIC, which
>>>>then completes the rest of low power mode sequence and brings the core
>>>>out of low power mode.
>>>>
>>>>The SPM has a set of control registers that configure the SPMs
>>>>individually based on the type of the core and the runtime conditions.
>>>>SPM is a finite state machine block to which a sequence is provided and
>>>>it interprets the bytes  and executes them in sequence. Each low power
>>>>mode that the core can enter into is provided to the SPM as a sequence.
>>>>
>>>>Configure the SPM to set the core (cpu or L2) into its low power mode,
>>>>the index of the first command in the sequence is set in the SPM_CTL
>>>>register. When the core executes ARM wfi instruction, it triggers the
>>>>SPM state machine to start executing from that index. The SPM state
>>>>machine waits until the interrupt occurs and starts executing the rest
>>>>of the sequence until it hits the end of the sequence. The end of the
>>>>sequence jumps the core out of its low power mode.
>>>>
>>>>Based on work by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub at codeaurora.org>,
>>>>Ai Li <ali at codeaurora.org>, Praveen Chidambaram <pchidamb at codeaurora.org>
>>>>Original tree available at -
>>>>git://codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10.git
>>>>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer at linaro.org>
>>>>---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,saw2.txt      |  31 ++-
>>>>  drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig                           |   8 +
>>>>  drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile                          |   1 +
>>>>  drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c                             | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  4 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
>>>>
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>+
>>>>+static struct spm_driver_data *spm_get_drv(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>+{
>>>>+       struct spm_driver_data *drv = NULL;
>>>>+       struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node;
>>>>+       u32 cpu;
>>>>+
>>>>+       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>>>+               if (drv)
>>>>+                       break;
>>>>+               cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
>>>
>>>I have not looked at the patch in detail, just this caught my attention
>>>as I removed most of these unnecessary parsing in ARM code. Unless you
>>>need this before topology_init, you need not parse DT to get cpu_node.
>>>You can use of_cpu_device_node_get instead.
>>Thanks. But in this usecase, I may need to iterate through all possible
>>cpus and do a get of the cpu and then get the SAW instance from that and
>>compare against the SPM instance that is being probed.
>>SPM does not have a reference to the CPU.
>
>No that shouldn't matter. If spm_get_drv is called after topology_init 
>(which if IIRC is subsys_initcall), then what I meant is you need not
>parse DT(via of_get_cpu_node) instead fetch the stashed cpu_node using
>of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu_num)
Ah, Ok. 
>
>Regards,
>Sudeep
>