[PATCH v7 6/7] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage
Peter Zijlstra
peterz at infradead.org
Thu Oct 9 05:16:43 PDT 2014
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:13:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> +static inline bool
> +group_has_capacity(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
> {
> + if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) >
> + (sgs->group_usage * env->sd->imbalance_pct))
> + return true;
Why the imb_pct there? We're looking for 100% utilization, not 130 or
whatnot, right?
> + if (sgs->sum_nr_running < sgs->group_weight)
> + return true;
With the code as it stands, this is the cheaper test (no mults) so why
is it second?
> + return false;
> +}
>
> +static inline bool
> +group_is_overloaded(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
> +{
> + if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= sgs->group_weight)
> + return false;
> +
> + if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) <
> + (sgs->group_usage * env->sd->imbalance_pct))
> + return true;
>
> + return false;
> }
Same thing here wrt imb_pct
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list