[PATCH v2 4/4] clk: Use ww_mutexes for clk_prepare_{lock/unlock}

Mike Turquette mturquette at linaro.org
Wed Oct 8 19:59:23 PDT 2014


Quoting Stephen Boyd (2014-10-07 18:09:22)
> On 09/29/2014 05:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >   I'm also auditing clock
> > drivers to find potential brokenness.
> >
> 
> These are places where we re-enter the framework under drivers/clk/. It 
> looks like sirf can be ported to use determine_rate() and something like 
> my "safe parent" patch. Tegra is concerning given that they call 
> clk_get_rate() in atomic context which is bad because that 
> clk_get_rate() can sleep on the prepare mutex. Otherwise we can probably 
> just convert that to use the unlocked variants. I'm aware of the qcom 
> one, maybe we need a framework flag that indicates that all parent 
> clocks must be enabled to switch this clock's parent. The last one is 
> versatile which I hope we can convert to use assigned-rates?

+Barry for SiRF
+Sachin for Versatile
+Viresh for SPEaR
+Peter for Tegra

For those just joining the thread, Stephen's proposal to replace the
global clk_prepare mutex with per-clock ww_mutexes breaks the reentrant
behavior of the clock framework. He has identified the below spots where
clock drivers rely on reentering into the framework. Can you take a look
at them and see if it is possible to handle it another way?

I'm pretty happy to get rid of reentrancy for two reasons:

1) Stephen's patch fixes the "spi deadlock problem", which reentrancy
did not solve. Reentrancy only solved the "i2c deadlock problem" which
the ww_mutex approach also solves nicely.

2) The current reentrancy scheme does not take advantage of lockdep for
checking correctness. It is very possible to silent hang yourself
(though I've not seen any reports of that ... yet).

Regards,
Mike

> 
> drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:409:        ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk, 
> clk_pll1.hw.clk);
> drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:414:        ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk, 
> clk_pll2.hw.clk);
> drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:419:        ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk, 
> clk_pll3.hw.clk);
> drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:427:        ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk, 
> clk_pll2.hw.clk);
> drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:433:    ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk, 
> clk_pll1.hw.clk);
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:103: clk_set_parent(hw->clk, new_parent);
> drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:431:    ret2 = 
> clk_set_rate(clk_pll1.hw.clk, rate);
> drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8960.c:520:        ret = 
> clk_prepare_enable(clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i));
> drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8960.c:549: 
> clk_disable_unprepare(clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i));
> Not necessary? drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:168:    struct clk 
> *parent_clk = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
> Not necessary? drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:169:    struct clk 
> *pll_parent_clk = clk_get_parent(parent_clk);
> Not necessary! drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:181:    struct clk 
> *parent_clk = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
> drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:423:    cur_parent = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
> drivers/clk/spear/clk-vco-pll.c:90: 
> __clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk)));
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c:732:    unsigned long input_rate = 
> clk_get_rate(clk_get_parent(hw->clk));
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c:1288:    unsigned long input_rate = 
> clk_get_rate(clk_get_parent(hw->clk));
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:82:    struct clk *old_parent = 
> __clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
> drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8960.c:520:        ret = 
> clk_prepare_enable(clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i));
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:102: clk_prepare(new_parent);
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:104: clk_unprepare(old_parent);
> 
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list