[PATCH] arm64: optimize memcpy_{from,to}io() and memset_io()
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Fri Oct 3 09:31:42 PDT 2014
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:28:26PM -0700, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> Optimize memcpy_{from,to}io() and memset_io() by transferring in 64 bit
> as much as possible with minimized barrier usage. This simplest optimization
> brings faster throughput compare to current byte-by-byte read and write with
> barrier in the loop. Code's skeleton is taken from the powerpc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <joonwoop at codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Trilok Soni <tsoni at codeaurora.org>
I thought about merging this but there are some issues. Comments below.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/io.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/io.c
> index 7d37ead..c0e3ab1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/io.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/io.c
> @@ -20,18 +20,34 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
>
> +#define IO_CHECK_ALIGN(v, a) ((((unsigned long)(v)) & ((a) - 1)) == 0)
Can you not use just IS_ALIGNED?
> /*
> * Copy data from IO memory space to "real" memory space.
> */
> void __memcpy_fromio(void *to, const volatile void __iomem *from, size_t count)
> {
> - unsigned char *t = to;
> - while (count) {
> + while (count && (!IO_CHECK_ALIGN(from, 8) || !IO_CHECK_ALIGN(to, 8))) {
> + *(u8 *)to = readb_relaxed(from);
We should not use the relaxed accessors here as we don't really care
about endianness conversion. We just copy data from one place to another
without interpreting it, so __raw_read*() is sufficient.
> + from++;
> + to++;
> count--;
> - *t = readb(from);
> - t++;
> + }
> +
> + while (count >= 8) {
> + *(u64 *)to = readq_relaxed(from);
> + from += 8;
> + to += 8;
> + count -= 8;
> + }
> +
> + while (count) {
> + *(u8 *)to = readb_relaxed(from);
> from++;
> + to++;
> + count--;
> }
> + __iormb();
We don't need this barrier here. In the readl() implementation, it's use
is for ordering between I/O polling and DMA buffer access.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcpy_fromio);
>
> @@ -40,12 +56,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcpy_fromio);
> */
> void __memcpy_toio(volatile void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count)
> {
> - const unsigned char *f = from;
> + void *p = (void __force *)from;
Why do you need this?
> +
> + __iowmb();
Not needed here either.
> + while (count && (!IO_CHECK_ALIGN(p, 8) || !IO_CHECK_ALIGN(from, 8))) {
> + writeb_relaxed(*(volatile u8 *)from, p);
Oh, so you copy from "from" to "from". Have you really tested this?
> @@ -55,10 +87,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcpy_toio);
> */
> void __memset_io(volatile void __iomem *dst, int c, size_t count)
> {
> + void *p = (void __force *)dst;
Do you need this?
> + u64 qc = c;
> +
> + qc |= qc << 8;
> + qc |= qc << 16;
> + qc |= qc << 32;
> +
> + __iowmb();
What's this for?
> + while (count && !IO_CHECK_ALIGN(p, 8)) {
> + writeb_relaxed(c, p);
Using dst here directly here should work (__raw_writeb takes the same
type as the second argument).
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list