[RFC 5/7] soc: qcom: Add Shared Memory Driver
Stephen Boyd
sboyd at codeaurora.org
Thu Oct 2 15:38:18 PDT 2014
On 09/29/14 17:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> +
> +#define GET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param) \
> + (channel->rx_info_word ? \
> + channel->rx_info_word->param : \
> + channel->rx_info->param)
> +
> +#define GET_TX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param) \
> + (channel->rx_info_word ? \
> + channel->tx_info_word->param : \
> + channel->tx_info->param)
> +
> +#define SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param, value) \
> + (channel->rx_info_word ? \
> + (channel->rx_info_word->param = value) : \
> + (channel->rx_info->param = value))
> +
> +#define SET_TX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, param, value) \
> + (channel->rx_info_word ? \
Drive-by review: Should this be tx_info_word? Given that it works I
wonder why not just have a flag indicating if we should use word aligned
read/write vs. byte aligned.
> + (channel->tx_info_word->param = value) : \
> + (channel->tx_info->param = value))
> +
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list