[PATCH 00/26] ARM: OMAP2+: PRCM cleanups for 3.18 merge window
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Thu Oct 2 09:32:02 PDT 2014
* Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com> [140924 02:04]:
> On 09/19/2014 08:27 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> >>However, I saw the following crash at boot on 37xxevm during one of
> >>the boot test. Ran thirty more boot tests afterwards on that board
> >>and it did not recur. It seems unlikely that the problem is related
> >>to this series, but looks like we may have some intermittent boot
> >>failure or race on 37xx :-(
> >
> >...
> >
> >>[ 4.892211] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1028) at 0xfa318034
> >>[ 4.900299] Internal error: : 1028 [#1] SMP ARM
> >>[ 4.905090] Modules linked in:
> >>[ 4.908325] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.17.0-rc5-12866-g0164b2d #1
> >>[ 4.916320] task: c0835db0 ti: c082a000 task.ti: c082a000
> >>[ 4.922027] PC is at omap2_gp_timer_set_next_event+0x24/0x78
> >>[ 4.928009] LR is at clockevents_program_event+0xc0/0x148
> >>[ 4.933715] pc : [<c002622c>] lr : [<c00a2800>] psr: 00000193
> >>[ 4.933715] sp : c082bed8 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000000
> >>[ 4.945800] r10: 00000000 r9 : 24101100 r8 : c0839080
> >>[ 4.951324] r7 : 00000001 r6 : 237bc339 r5 : 0000009f r4 : 3d9759e7
> >>[ 4.958190] r3 : fa318034 r2 : c08cb920 r1 : 00000003 r0 : fffffec1
> >>[ 4.965087] Flags: nzcv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment kernel
> >>[ 4.972900] Control: 10c5387d Table: 80004019 DAC: 00000015
> >>[ 4.978942] Process swapper/0 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0xc082a248)
> >>[ 4.985290] Stack: (0xc082bed8 to 0xc082c000)
> >>[ 4.989868] bec0: 237bc339 00000001
> >>[ 4.998504] bee0: 00000001 24101100 00000001 cfc7d6c8 00000001 cfc7da50 cfc7d720 c00a4780
> >>[ 5.007141] bf00: 00000000 c00962b0 cfc7d720 c0096180 00000001 00000000 00000001 c08256c8
> >>[ 5.015777] bf20: c082a000 c08256c8 00000000 c00962b0 237b4c04 00000001 00000002 a0000193
> >>[ 5.024414] bf40: 00989680 00000000 00000000 24101100 00000001 cfc7da50 00000000 c108cc78
> >>[ 5.033020] bf60: 00000000 c00962b0 00000000 00000002 00000001 00000000 c108cc78 c00a56f0
> >>[ 5.041656] bf80: 00000000 00000002 237b4c04 00000001 c08c8ce8 c082a000 00000000 c08c8ce8
> >>[ 5.050292] bfa0: c08329dc c0832978 cfc7f0f8 c0072808 c0559928 c08270f0 c08caf40 c080fdc0
> >>[ 5.058929] bfc0: 00000000 c07c3b74 ffffffff ffffffff c07c35f0 00000000 00000000 c080fdc0
> >>[ 5.067535] bfe0: c08cb154 c0832968 c080fdbc c083763c 80004059 80008074 00000000 00000000
> >>[ 5.076171] [<c002622c>] (omap2_gp_timer_set_next_event) from [<c00a2800>] (clockevents_program_event+0xc0/0x148)
> >>[ 5.087005] [<c00a2800>] (clockevents_program_event) from [<c00a4780>] (tick_program_event+0x44/0x54)
> >>[ 5.096771] [<c00a4780>] (tick_program_event) from [<c0096180>] (__hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x3c0/0x4a0)
> >>[ 5.106597] [<c0096180>] (__hrtimer_start_range_ns) from [<c00962b0>] (hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x24/0x2c)
> >>[ 5.116577] [<c00962b0>] (hrtimer_start_range_ns) from [<c00a56f0>] (tick_nohz_idle_exit+0x140/0x1ec)
> >>[ 5.126342] [<c00a56f0>] (tick_nohz_idle_exit) from [<c0072808>] (cpu_startup_entry+0xf4/0x2d0)
> >>[ 5.135528] [<c0072808>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c07c3b74>] (start_kernel+0x340/0x3a8)
> >>[ 5.144165] [<c07c3b74>] (start_kernel) from [<80008074>] (0x80008074)
> >>[ 5.151031] Code: 13a0c000 0a000004 ee07cfba e592301c (e5931000)
> >>[ 5.157470] ---[ end trace f92de024d996d904 ]---
> >>[ 5.162353] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
> >>[ 5.169433] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
> >
> >Actually it just occurred to me that if something broke
> >*wait_target_ready(), we'd expect to see intermittent failures like this,
> >and this series touches *wait_target_ready(). So it might be worth taking
> >a look at that with a magnifying glass to make sure that it's working.
>
> I think this is probably something else, and most likely more hideous. The
> clock source timers are only enabled once during a boot, and they are never
> idled after that. This error happens almost 5 seconds after the initial
> module enable...?
I have not seen this and I've had this branch merged in for testing
here for about a week now. I've also merged it into linux-omap master
branch for merging now, let's keep it there and plan on merging it early
for v3.19 merge window unless some issues are found.
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list