[PATCH 1/2] socfpga: hotplug: put cpu1 in wfi
Dinh Nguyen
dinguyen at opensource.altera.com
Thu Oct 2 04:36:54 PDT 2014
On 10/1/14, 6:16 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2014-10-01 11:07:18, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/1/14, 10:04 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>>>> + __raw_writel(RSTMGR_MPUMODRST_CPU1,
>>>>>> + rst_manager_base_addr + 0x10);
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible to copy reset manager description struct from
>>>>> u-boot and use it here, instead of raw offset?
>>>>
>>>> I will replace this 0x10 with a macro that reflects how the register is
>>>> named in the register map.
>>>
>>> That would be better than 0x10, but even better would be just copying
>>>
>>> struct socfpga_reset_manager {
>>> u32 status;
>>> u32 ctrl;
>>> u32 counts;
>>> u32 padding1;
>>> u32 mpu_mod_reset;
>>> u32 per_mod_reset;
>>> u32 per2_mod_reset;
>>> u32 brg_mod_reset;
>>> };
>>>
>>> from u-boot. Unlike macros, structs have advantages that typos lead to
>>> easier-to-see failure modes... (And they are easier to read/parse,
>>> too).
>>>
>>
>> Copying from uboot sounds good, but I already know that the CPU reset
>> offset is different for our next SOC, Arria 10. The Arria 10 SOC should
>> still be able to use the same MSL as Cyclone5 and Arria5, but with a few
>> differences. One of them being, the CPU1 reset offset is at 0x20 instead
>> of 0x10. So I think having a macro for this one register is a bit
>> cleaner than having to define a whole new struct for Arria10.
>
> I don't think "whole new struct" is a problem. At least it will be
> plain to see what changed (which will get easily lost in ifdefs.
>
> struct cyclone5_reset_manager {
> struct socfpga_reset_manager common;
> u32 brg_mod_reset;
> }
>
> struct aria10_reset_manager {
> struct socfpga_reset_manager common;
> char filler[0x10];
> u32 brg_mod_reset;
> }
>
> if (of_machine_is_compatible("altr,socfpga-arria10"))
> __raw_writel(0, (struct cyclone5_reset_manager *) rst_manager_base_addr->brg_mod_reset));
> else
> __raw_writel(0, (struct aria10_reset_manager *) rst_manager_base_addr->brg_mod_reset));
>
> ...does not sound that bad. (And you'll need some nice solution for
> u-boot, anyway...)
>
That's fine.
Dinh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list