[PATCH] nand: omap2: fix building with CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_BCH=m
Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com
Wed Oct 1 03:25:45 PDT 2014
On 01 Oct 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2014 13:07:51 Roger Quadros wrote:
> > On 10/01/2014 12:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 October 2014 12:32:09 Roger Quadros wrote:
> > >>
> > >> With this patch NAND probe on DRA7xx fails like so
> > >>
> > >> [ 2.077313] omap-gpmc 50000000.gpmc: GPMC revision 6.0
> > >> [ 2.083842] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xca
> > >> [ 2.090524] nand: Micron MT29F2G16ABAEAWP
> > >> [ 2.094728] nand: 256MiB, SLC, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
> > >> [ 2.100745] nand: using OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW ECC scheme
> > >> [ 2.109764] omap2-nand: probe of omap2-nand.0 failed with error -38
> > >>
> > >> OMAP NAND driver is the only user of the ELM module and we want it
> > >> to be usable in all possible configurations when enabled.
> > >
> > > I don't understand. Is the BCH driver optional or not?
> > >
> > It is optional. If it is disabled we error out on platforms that have
> > the ELM IP. But if it is enabled, we don't want to fail probe on such platforms.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to treat the absence of the ELM driver the
> same way as the absence of the ELM hardware?
>
Indeed, it would be better to provide a fallback to the non-ELM behavior
if *anything* prevents initializing it.
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list