[PATCH 16/19] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Thu Nov 27 02:26:29 PST 2014
On 27/11/14 07:35, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds new Exynos5433 dtsi to support 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC
> based on Octal core CPUs (quad Cortex-A57 and quad Cortex-A53).
>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi at samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim at samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-pinctrl.dtsi | 698 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 523 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 1221 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-pinctrl.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3d8b576
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
[...]
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + interrupts = <1 13 0xff01>,
> + <1 14 0xff01>,
> + <1 11 0xff01>,
> + <1 10 0xff01>;
This is wrong. Timer interrupts for both A53 and A57 are level triggered.
> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
Please go and fix your firmware. Really...
> + use-clocksource-only;
> + use-physical-timer;
> + };
Well, that's a total NAK. Neither of these properties are part of the
binding, and we've already established that none of that would never be
valid on arm64.
I suggest you finally do what we've been asking for years, which is to
fix your boot ROM by adding the 5 lines of assembly code that are needed
instead of repeatedly post the same bogus DT files.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list