[PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: keystone: pm: switch to use generic pm domains
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Nov 25 04:09:40 PST 2014
On Tuesday 25 November 2014 13:08:57 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 11/25/2014 12:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 24 November 2014 22:44:06 Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2014-11-24 02:50:28)
> >>>
> >
> > I'm not sure I even understand what you intended the example to look
> > like, it does't parse
> >
> > My point above was completely different, the suggestion I made was
> > to not classify the clocks in DT at all, but to leave it all in
> > the client driver.
>
> I slept with this idea From one side it sounds good. Pls, Correct me if I'm wrong:
> - there still will be "simple-pmdomain" and all devices will be attached to it by
> default (or as specified in DT power-domains = <&simple_pmdomain>;);
I would assume only devices that set "power-domains = <&simple_pmdomain>"
> - drivers will use smth. like pm_clk_remove() to remove optional clocks from pm_clk;
Right. Regarding the naming of the function, I would pick something other
than remove, since the main purpose is not to have that clock abandoned
by the pm-domain code (this is still a side-effect), but to have the
clock put under control of the driver itself.
It might be possible to do this implicitly if the driver calls clk_get(),
basically doing clk_get() (or another call if necessary) would prevent the
simple pmdomain from turning it off during suspend.
> From another side:
> - drivers will get dependency from pm_clk;
There are three cases here:
- A device that is always used with a pm-domain, the driver doesn't
have to worry about it but do need the dependency on having the
simple-pmdomain code enabled.
- A device that may or may not have clocks, but if it has them, they
are managed through a pm-domain. In this case, it's platform dependent
whether we have the dependency. We may want to prevent the device from
being probed if a power-domain property is present but no driver
for the domain.
- A device that uses the pm-domain on some machines but not on others:
this is a bit tricky, because the driver will still have to know
about all the clocks, although we could choose not to turn off the
clocks during suspend if the power-domain is not set.
> - HW limitations can't be taken into account - it's possible that some clocks should
> not be enabled until it's allowed. And only driver know when it's allowed.
> Otherwise, HW state may become unspecified or wrong output can be generated.
Correct: if you have a device that you don't want to be handled by a simple
pm-domain, then you have to connect it to a different pm-domain, e.g. one that
manages a fixed set of clocks itself.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list